|
Post by stacy on Jan 5, 2012 1:12:12 GMT -5
I was looking up information on weight ratios of horse and rider and found this formula
1. Add weight of horse + rider + tack In my case this is (approx weight of Ruger) 950 + 165 + 40=1155 2. Divide this number by the circumference of the horse's cannon bone midway between knee and fetlock. In my (Ruger's) case 8.5 inches 1155/8.5=135.88 3. Take this number and divide it by 2 In my case 135.88/2=67.94
According to the article, values near 75 are great, below even better. Values between 75-80 are "acceptable" . " Values over 80 indicate weaker legs and need to train carefully, especially downhill."
I was so excited about this, because Ruger is a PEANUT. He is so little, but has big cannon bones.
I would be curious to know how big the kiger mare's cannon bones are.
|
|
|
Post by stormyranch on Jan 5, 2012 8:49:23 GMT -5
Interesting. I will check mine:-)
|
|
|
Post by DianneC on Jan 7, 2012 23:46:16 GMT -5
Seems like the boys' bones would need to be bigger than a mare's, with all the crashing around and fighting they have to do. But mares carry more weight when they are pregnant so maybe not. It will be interesting to see.
|
|