First, maybe we should seperate Spanish as opposed to Iberian. In most other countries, when you talk about a Spanish horse, you are referring to the Andalusian in Spain. They are considered THE Spanish horse.
This is a summary of what is considered "Iberian" breeds:
"The Iberian horse is a title given to a number of horse breeds native to the Iberian peninsula. At present, 17 horse breeds are recognized by FAO (2005) as characteristic of the Iberian Peninsula.
Three are Portuguese, the Lusitano, Sorraia and Garrano, and the remaining 14 are Spanish. These include the Asturcón, Burguete, Caballo de Monte del País Vasco, Pura Raza Gallega, Pura Raza Española (Andalusian horse), Hispano-Arabe, Hispano-Bretón, Jaca Navarra, Losina, Monchina and Pottoka, as well as the Cavall Mallorquí, Mallorquina and Menorquina (subsets of the Balearic breed).A spinoff from the Sorraia, the Marismeño, has also been identified living in Doñana National Park, but is not on the FAO list."
Okay, now the Spanish Horse:
"The Andalusian, also known as the Pure Spanish Horse or PRE (Pura Raza Española), is a horse breed from the Iberian Peninsula, where its ancestors have lived for thousands of years. The Andalusian has been recognized as an individual breed since the 15th century, and its conformation has changed very little over the centuries...."
In the USA, only do we have such a variety when we speak of subjects like this and have 20 different breeds that all fall under the "Spanish" umbrella. Whether "new and improved" or "old and original", it is misleading and confusing. Consider also, many have different types of conformation. So, while Spanish is considered a breed, Iberian is considered a type (again, everywhere but here!). It would be more correct to say different breeds are Iberian, not Spanish unless they are an Andalusian. That, however, will never change in the states.
I only bring this up because the goal with the Kiger should not be to breed the "poor mans" Andalusian, but rather a unique breed with Iberian type.
Okay, separate out what is Spanish conformation as opposed to Iberian conformation. Ideally, they should be one and the same; in fact, they are not. I don't want to get into a lengthly debate on that but rather the main differences. If we consider the Spanish horse as the Andalusian, then consider that when Spain outlawed bullfighting the horses began being used for carriage driving. This means they became prettier, calmer, fancier stepping and the conformation did change for a period of time. Once bullfighting became such a popular tourist draw in Portugal, Spain went back to it. While some lines have stayed closer to the bullfighting conformation, many had deviated toward the other. Wouldn't you know it, but when Americans began buying Andalusians, guess what lines they wanted to get rid of...
Guess what the US market was dumped with...
You got it, the carriage lines. Not that we didn't want it! Folks were drawn to the fancy stepping, long haired, sweet horses. We got what we wanted for sure!
So, now this is the example we have in America as the Spanish horse. Weaker backs, as they began not being used so much for riding plus it had to change in order to get that pretty front leg action; straighter shoulders; front leg conformation moving more forward for lift (but harder to put a saddle on); hind end moving out behind the horse instead of under to carry a rider well. Just notice the flatter croups on them.
On the flip side, take the Iberian breeds (which is a
type): they have been bred to be ridden working horses. This is where the saddle horse conformation comes from: easy to train, comfortable to ride and built for longevity of usage. What of those three traits is NOT desirable??!!
This has always been my longstanding argument with the Kiger breed standards. We are following something that is not only incorrect in theory but in fact when we say our horses are Spanish. Yes, they do have some Spanish traits (meaning similar to Andalusians) - liked hooked ears, straight shoulders, front legs placed too forward and downhill. BUT, are any of these traits desirable? These should be bred out simply because they are of no use as a saddle horse; surely not in the breed standard!
The Iberian traits they do have, should be focused on simply because it is of more use - plain and simple. Built uphill; front legs centered in the shoulder for strength, balance and saddle fit; topline longer than under line; straight back; sloped croup for balance, drive and comfort of rider - basically, LONGEVITY OF USE! This is why the Iberian type should be looked at and focused on; it is in the herds and you have to look closely in the last few generations because it is slipping away. When folks see horses with croups and hips like my older grulla mare, they think weak or light -when in fact, not only do they not understand the dynamics of it but they don't consider that true Iberian horses don't have heavy muscling genetically, they have to be worked to build that up. Honestly, a wild horse should not be heavy muscled either for efficiency of movement and covering ground - plus it takes a lot more protein to feed that muscle. Another thing that should be stayed away from in breeding the Kigers it the tendency toward insulin resistance - which can be seen in many of the horses in the last roundup; but that is another thread and another link to the Andalusian...
And the hooked ears? Who cares! That comes from when the Arabians were used to expand genetic diversity in the Andalusians!
And for those who like a more stock type build - you can get that with more Iberian traits. Just look at the Azteca - not the American Azetca (first generations anyway), look at the good Mexican Azteca that adheres to strict breeding guidelines and does not use QH mare that are even build downhill! I'll find some and post here later...
Okay, Sarah, you asked for my opinion and you got it!